Let's not just assume that a majority of voters actually approved the increase in school system funding. A better assumption would be that anything put up for a vote in Oregon would be subject to the same fraud that is standard in Oregon elections, which has given the state seemingly permanent one-party control.
Let's not just assume that a majority of voters actually approved the increase in school system funding. A better assumption would be that anything put up for a vote in Oregon would be subject to the same fraud that is standard in Oregon elections, which has given the state seemingly permanent one-party control.
I don't. It is addressed in the article. 19% turnout, mail-in balloting, etc. Recipe for the "soft corruption of public consent."